Why Trump Insists On Talking About The Risk Of Vote By Mail Fraud When Actually There Is Not

Amy Coney Barrett takes first oath as new US Chief Justice

American judge Amy Coney Barrett took her first oath as Chief Justice in the Supreme Court on Tuesday morning (Dutch time) at the White...

US Senate confirms Amy Barrett, Trump’s candidate, as new Supreme Court Justice

The United States Senate confirmed this Monday, eight days before the presidential elections, to Amy Barrett as the new Supreme Court Justice, and thus...

Donald Trump’s victory a few days before the elections: they confirm the judge who proposed for the Supreme Court

It is about the ardent opponent of abortion Amy Coney Barrett. He is the third judge that Trump manages to appoint in his...

The extradition trial of director Huawei resumed in Canada

The controversial case about the extradition of Huawei's CFO, Meng Wanzhou, was restarted in a court in Vancouver (Canada) with the questioning of...

Amy Coney Barrett was appointed judge of the U.S. Supreme Court

Appointed Judge of the U.S. Supreme Court Amy Coney Barrett. Barrett, 48, will replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died of pancreatic cancer in...

This idea, favored by the increase in remote voting requests due to the epidemic, fits in with the traditional Republican strategy of making it difficult for minorities who support Democrats to access the polls.

Voting in a pandemic is not easy. It is true that the risk of contagion is not necessarily greater than that of going to a store or supermarket to do the shopping: a waiting line that almost always takes place outdoors, a few minutes (not many) in a closed place with more people (not too many) who hardly have to interact closely, and outside. But it constitutes one more act of exposure, a small ticket in the covid-19 lottery. It is for this reason that many people, particularly those belonging to risk groups, prefer to exercise their right without traveling and vote by mail. But the president and candidate for re-election Donald Trump has decided to turn this event into a scandal, pointing to a risk (of which there is no reliable evidence) of massive fraud to dismount him in the middle of the race.

All of this may appear as one more Trump occurrence, but in reality it is one more link in a chain of long-standing arguments raised by the Republican Party, aimed at limiting access to the vote of broad layers of American society: in This country, when turnout is high, is usually good news for Democrats because they are racial minorities, lower-income households, more skewed to the left. And the real reason why these kinds of strategies are even possible in the United States, one of the few established democracies in which the right to vote is an open matter for debate, is in a way the original sin of the longest-lived democracy. of the world.

America is a huge country, and very, very scattered. Especially in its north-western extreme: the expansion towards the west during the 19th century and part of the 20th produced a sparse geography, where distances have a very different scale from the coastal metropolises. In that corner of your map are Oregon and Washington, two states that passed vote-by-mail for their entire population in 1998 and 2011 respectively. Colorado would join in 2013. Hawaii and Utah also consider voting by mail as the default option. Consequently, the majority of votes in these places are cast by post.

In sum, one in five votes in the Trump-Clinton election were cast by mail across the country. The proportion varies greatly from one State to another, but in most of them the trend is upwards: in the last two decades, the figure has doubled, driven mainly by the incorporation of this practice in the States mentioned above. and for those places that do not require a specific excuse to vote for this mode; mainly California, the most populous state in the country.

These figures are in no small measure a product of the variation in regulations: a Brookings Institute study that calibrates the quality of access to vote-by-mail draws the west-east gradation well.

But, and this is remarkable, another dividing line is also guessed: the old border between North and South. One that immediately and irremediably leads the eye to the Civil War.

The United States had to go to war with itself when the Union was incomplete so that the Constitution, a century after its drafting, would finally include the following sentence: “The right of United States citizens to vote cannot be denied or limited by the Union or by any of its member states for reasons of race, color or prior condition of servitude ”. It is the 15th Amendment, which cost a civil conflict over the central issue of slavery. That is the original sin of one of the democracies on which all the rest of the world were modeled: the condition in which it maintained its population of African-American origin from its foundation until that moment, stripping it of all rights, also the most basic precisely in a democracy.

But even after the amendment was passed in 1870, southern states still managed to maintain a apartheid comprised in a dense tangle of restrictions, among which were also a number of apparently administrative limitations that were in fact designed to restrict the effective vote of African Americans. It took another century for the federal government to approve a preventive legal lever: it reserved by right the prerogative to review any voting legislation of any member state. A part of the South did not like it (nor that, nor that the possibility of legislating where a person sat or what bar a person could go according to their skin color disappeared), to the point that then-president Lyndon Johnson (Democratic Party) had to force certain state governments to comply with the standard.

From the 1960s to the present day, this tug of war has moved into the legislative chambers of the States and the courts: a constant tug of war in which politicians from the dominant party in the south, the Republican, look for ways every increasingly creative to limit the access to vote of those who know they will not give it to them, but to those who defended their civil rights (the Democrats). One of the most common is the introduction of additional requirements to show some form of identification when voting (the US does not have a federal identification card), a requirement that is less likely to be met by racial and economic minorities than they are more likely to fall into the exclusion margins of the system.

Note the certain similarity that the distribution of this type of requirements has with the facility for voting by mail painted in the previous map; particularly, in the southeastern part of the nation. A historical heritage that lives on today, despite the fact that the Supreme Court is not of this opinion. In a 2018 decision, the court struck down parts of the legislation passed in Johnson’s time, essentially arguing that the country had already overcome those problems and the right of states to organize elections as they saw fit prevailed over the desire to the capital to prevail over them.

But the 2016 data indicates that there is still a very clear race bias in people registered to vote (the only requirement common to the entire federation is to register before exercising your right).

Also of income, which is inevitably a consequence of the former, while the majority of lower-income households in the US are not white.


Related Articles