What are the new radioactive hazards discovered by researchers

Five corona infections in Vice President Mike Pence’s circle – continues to campaign

Five people vice president Mike Pension a related party has been infected with the corona. With the Pence Personnel Manager Marc Shortilla was...

Italy closes bars and restaurants at 6:00 p.m. and activities such as cinemas and theaters for a month

The Prime Minister of Italy, Giuseppe Conte, has signed this Sunday the new package of restriction measures against coronavirus in the country, effective as...

Plebiscite in Chile: How is the country doing, after a year of protests and the coronavirus hit?

This Sunday they will vote whether to approve or reject a new Constitution to replace the one inherited from the Pinochet era. Any cursory...

Coronavirus in Spain: state of alarm and curfew from 11 at night for six months

In principle it will be for 15 days although it is scheduled to last until May 9. This time it is not aimed...

Leopoldo López arrives in Spain after secretly traveling from Caracas

The Venezuelan opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez is already in Spain. The powerful opponent of the Nicolá Maduro regime arrived in the early...

In addition to the countless ways in which it destroys the environment, it turns out that drilling into the earth’s crust also releases radioactive particles into the air that could pollute nearby cities.

New research shows that these radioactive particles can be released from the ground and transported long distances by wind, reports The Guardian. This is worrying news, and Harvard researchers behind the study warn that it could pose an undeclared risk to the health of people living in the area.

Radioactive particles were more widespread in the wind in the areas of the drilling sites, according to a investigation recently published in the journal Nature Communications which examined public data from around 120,000 such sites in the US. Even at 20 kilometers (12.4 miles) away, which was as close to any site as public data obtained, the radioactivity was 40% higher than the background levels.

“If you asked me to go and live in such areas, I wouldn’t go,” Petros Koutrakis, Harvard’s lead author and environmental health researcher, told The Guardian. “People should not go crazy, but I think it is a significant risk that needs to be addressed,” he added.

The study adds the importance of airborne radiation to the end of a long list of health and environmental hazards caused by this process – including waterborne radiation – that no US presidential candidate seems to have any interest in stopping.

“We should not ask ourselves to what extent the radioactive risk in the air caused by drilling is compared to the risk on water,” Marco Kaltofen, a scientist at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute who did not work on the study, told The Guardian. “We should ask ourselves if it is a good idea to add radioactive particles either in the air or in the water. This study suggests that the answer is clearly no. “


Related Articles