The VAR audios in River-Nacional: one after the other the 5 controversial performs which can be nonetheless being mentioned in Uruguay

Conmebol broadcast the dialogues between the referee Andrés Rojas and the video judges in 5 controversial rulings. Take heed to what they mentioned.

Conmebol broadcast this Friday the audios of the Colombian referee Andrés Rojas together with his teammates from the video room throughout the sport that River beat Nacional 2-0 on the Independiente courtroom within the first leg for the quarterfinals of the Cup Liberators. He did it with 5 controversial performs. In fact, this doesn’t change the row in Uruguay.

1) It was not a penalty although there was a hand from a Nacional participant

Mathias Laborda rejected bitten and the ball bounced off his proper hand, 17 minutes into the primary half. There was a verify however no penalty was charged as a result of rule 12 signifies that it shouldn’t be penalized if the ball hits the arm after hitting the foot or the top. These are conditions wherein the footballer doesn’t have time to keep away from contact. The video gamers say: “I see a large hand”, however they resolve to not cost it after they see that it doesn’t bounce off the ground however on the foot of the footballer.

2) River’s penalty within the first half

Matías Suárez entered the realm and fell after a contact with Oliveros, from Nacional.The penalty was very uncertain as a result of there was no displacement although the striker fell to the bottom. Within the audio, the VAR decide is heard saying: “This shot doesn’t work for me.” Later, they warn Rojas: “Ultimately, he finally ends up pushing him.” This, as a result of an arm of Oliveros is seen on the again of Suárez. They interpreted that this justified the infraction.

3) Suárez’s objective disallowed for offside

On the finish of the primary half, Suárez had a objective disallowed for a really superb offside, wherein he got here nearly from the center of the sector. “It is tight, please wait,” they inform Rojas. “Let me see if it is the tip of the shoulder.” They ask to regulate the strains and on the tip they warn you that it’s ahead place.

4) The hand within the penalty that Montiel transformed

The ball hits Laborda’s hand in a punishable motion, as a result of the Nacional footballer separated his arm from the physique and expanded his space of ​​motion. They inform Rojas to cease the sport, however he replies: “Now I can not.” When it cuts, you’re invited to observe the motion on the display. Rojas says: “It takes up more room, excellent, present me the entire play please. Proper Nicolás, I am wanting on the hand. Develop the amount. It’s separated from the physique … Throw the middle, bounce, the hand of quantity 2 expands the amount There is no such thing as a mounted receiver. My choice is a penalty, not a card. ”

5) The two to 0 of River, the declare for offside of Zuculini

Suárez assists Zuculini, who scores with a header in damage time. The VAR warns him: “Return, I wish to see the purpose of contact of the primary play that appears extra offside. Go forward, that’s good. Now he needs to see the second … Cease, now I see exterior sport. Give me that time of contact. ” They ask Rojas to not resume. The VAR says: “We’re going to search for the road with the ball.” They warn Rojas: “Within the second motion there isn’t a offside.” Every little thing occurs in gradual movement. They declare that the road is with the ball and never with the defender, which is clear as a result of there may be by no means an offside if the receiver is on the identical line or behind the ball. They ask once more to rearrange the strains on the ball. “Objective confirmed, Andrés, you’ll be able to resume”, they warn him.

Supply: company

.

trending

Related Articles