The virus remembers our elementary situation: precarious beings that, removed from being autonomous, are anchored in nature. The pandemic provides the chance to rebuild our relationship with the setting
That we come out of a uncommon 12 months is apparent: it not often occurs that governments lock up residents by decree. An expertise from which residents don’t go unpunished, by far, that in keeping with the adaptive capability of people, they’ve endured with dignity. There’s an fascinating first lesson from this expertise: people transfer increasingly more between continuity and rupture, with out the forces that search to depart the previous behind being radically imposed.
What occurred when the massive alarm sounded? What appeared unthinkable: that within the face of doubts, within the face of ignorance, they acted as different instances all through historical past within the face of pandemic phenomena: locking up the employees. That’s to say, within the face of ignorance, go for the standard, one thing human, enormously human. And but we have been much better outfitted than within the previous pandemics, and the researchers have been on the quick monitor, whereas assets have been added from in all places. And once more the surprising got here: vaccines discovered the technical acceleration essential to interrupt all calendar forecasts: and they’re right here. As soon as once more, a glance again and a step ahead. A logic that has confirmed to be alive even in instances of nice acceleration.
Reminiscence counts and confusion has been particularly sturdy in these nations and generations that weren’t inhabited by the instant reminiscence of huge infections. In Spain, the border goes via the Nineteen Fifties, when vaccines and antibiotics turned widespread and we have been forgetting the threats of the time (from measles to leprosy, from smallpox to tuberculosis or polio) . Therefore, the confusion has been very completely different between generations. However past the shock, the uneasiness has come to confirm the fragility of a society that lived trusting within the powers of know-how and science.
Simply when some have been preaching post-humanism, fabulating with the species taking off in direction of a future with out limits, the virus has reminded us of our elementary situation: precarious beings that removed from being totally autonomous we’re completely anchored in nature. And so the pandemic provides us a superb alternative to rebuild our relationship with the setting based mostly on the methods of deciphering it, beginning with information. Etienne Klein is true to advise us to be taught the distinction between science – established information – and analysis – in a everlasting technique of trial and error.
In different phrases, the pandemic has darkened the world, however it could additionally serve to supply clues whether it is confirmed that it’s within the difficulties that humanity progresses. However the paths should not determined and the wrestle to hint them will probably be huge within the coming years, because the pandemic erupts right into a disaster that was already underway: who will rule the long run? What would be the decision-making framework? Removed from a world neighborhood, is there an alternative choice to the previous nation states? Emmanuel Macron represents in a means this contradiction. On the one hand, he goes again to his previous methods: “To be French is to inhabit a language and a historical past, that’s, to enroll in a collective future.” And, on the opposite, as Olivier Faye factors out, the European best is identified as a method to regain management of our financial, technological, navy and cultural future. It’s not a contradiction. It’s a affirmation of the problem that politics has at this time to border citizenship.
This disaster comes when liberal democracies dwell in a sea of doubts. The pandemic impacts life, which places the general public on guard that if there may be one factor they’re prepared to just accept all the pieces, it’s for well being. Are we shifting in direction of a society that seeks safety above some other worth? Is there a democratic means to do that if we all know the right way to distinguish between the chance worth of patriarchy and the values of remedy and care that bear the mark of the feminist revolution? In any case, the hazard that challenges us all is that worry paves the best way for the acceptance of authoritarianism. The French jurist Mireille Delmas-Marty places it in a really graphic means: are we going to go from “freedom, equality, fraternity” to “safety, effectivity and predictability”? Placing a political face on this newest triad scares me. And that’s the reason insurance policies that “within the face of the pandemic select to immobilize people and destabilize societies” are disturbing.